Princeton Review Book: Page 95

 Posts: 7
 Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:07 pm
Princeton Review Book: Page 95
I can't figure out where the typo is on #3... help?
Re: Princeton Review Book: Page 95
Not sure that there is one  are you referring to the 4th edition?

 Posts: 2
 Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:47 pm
Re: Princeton Review Book: Page 95
Assuming you are using version 4: the error isn't on page 95, but in the solution set. The answer itself is correct. The errors made are just typographical.
On page 339 #3. The first limit where it says lim x> n [x] = (n+1) should instead read as lim x>n [x] = (n+1). (notice the negative sign in the limit) Similarly the limit should be the same for the first absolute value. They are just missing the negatives.
On page 339 #3. The first limit where it says lim x> n [x] = (n+1) should instead read as lim x>n [x] = (n+1). (notice the negative sign in the limit) Similarly the limit should be the same for the first absolute value. They are just missing the negatives.